|
|
Home > Funded
Research Home > All > Sort
by Author (A-Z) > Levy / Levy & Meltzer / DeLeire, Levine & Levy |
ERIU Funded Research Projects
Sort by: Author (A-Z) | Topic
|
|
Author: Levy, Helen
Working Paper: The Economic Consequences of Being Uninsured (PDF) ; October 2002
Abstract:
I estimate the impact of being diagnosed with a serious new health condition
(cancer, diabetes, heart attack, chronic lung disease, or stroke) on household wealth, food
consumption and total household income for households with and without health
insurance at baseline, using data from the first four waves of the Health and Retirement
Study. I find that health shocks do not have a significant effect on consumption;
households are able to smooth the impact of these shocks. Whether they deplete wealth in
order to do so is not entirely clear; the estimated effect of a health shock on wealth is
large (about $28,000) for both insured and uninsured households, but is not statistically
significant. The proportional effect on wealth is estimated to be larger for uninsured
households (a drop of 20 percent) than for insured households (a drop of about 2 percent),
but again, neither effect is significantly different from zero. Health shocks reduce
household income by about $9,000 and reduce the probability of work by about ten
percentage points; the labor supply response to a shock is about the same whether or not a
household has insurance. There is no evidence that the uninsured face significantly higher
economic risks than the insured in the event of a health shock. |
|
|
|
|
Author: Levy, Helen ; Meltzer,
David
Working Paper: What Do We Really
Know About Whether Health Insurance Affects Health?
(PDF) ; December
2001
Research Highlight 2 (HTML)
(PDF)
; March 2003
Q & A with David Meltzer, M.D.,
Ph.D. (HTML)
Abstract:
It is widely assumed that lack of coverage
has deleterious effects on health status. This
assumption is based on two important causative
relationships: first, that being insured is critically
important to receiving appropriate and timely medical
care and, second, that receiving appropriate and
timely medical care has a significant effect on
health status. We analyze the evidence that relates
to these assumptions and conclude that, with the
exception of a few studies of elderly and child
subpopulations, there is little concrete evidence
of the existence or magnitude of these causative
relationships. This paper is one of six papers
commissioned at the outset of ERIU to provide a
critical synthesis of the existing literature on
who does not have health insurance, why they do
not have health insurance, and what difference
health insurance makes. The papers appeared in final form in Health Policy and the Uninsured published by Urban Institute Press in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Author: DeLeire,
Thomas ; Levine, Judith ; Levy, Helen
Working Paper: Is Welfare Reform
Responsible for Low-Skilled Women’s Declining
Health Insurance Coverage in the 1990s? (PDF)
; August 2004
Abstract:
We use data from the 1989-2001 March
Supplements to the Current Population Survey
to determine whether welfare reform contributed
to the declines in health insurance coverage
experienced by low-skilled women over this period.
During the 1990s, women with less than a high
school education experienced a 10.1 percentage
point decline in the probability of having health
insurance. By contrast, during the same period,
women with a high school degree experienced a
smaller (3.6 percentage point) decline in health
insurance coverage while women with a college
education experienced only a very small decline
in health insurance coverage. Against this backdrop
of large overall declines in health insurance
coverage, welfare waivers were associated with
a modest, 1.8 percentage point, increase in health
insurance coverage for low-skilled women by increasing
their probability of having private health insurance,
while Temporary Assistance to Needy Families
(TANF) itself had no statistically significant
effect. Overall, welfare reform did not contribute
to declines in coverage but rather offset them
somewhat. Unfortunately, some groups among low-skilled
women did not experience these relative gains
in coverage in response to reforms including
non-employed women, African- American women,
unmarried women, and unmarried women with children.
Neither welfare waivers nor TANF were associated
with increases in insurance coverage among women
with a high school or college education. |
|
|
|
|
|